用快播看黄桌面客户端已重新发布上架,可以前往顶部导航的下载中心进行下载!
您现在的位置:首页  »  欧美剧  »  www_97gan_com_
国外成人网站网址

www_97gan_com_在线观看

主演:
吴震 琏二爷 黄十千 张魁 李蓓蓓 
状态:
64集
以下影片也许你会喜欢:
77自由爱》简介:

 www_22bbb_com,琼海房产投资热历史重演:当年套牢者悄悄出货 ,新浪cn邮箱登陆,同时值得注意的是,AI、AR等技术的发展进一步推动着数字阅读产品创新与产业升级。张倏雨人体艺术,6.县域社会经济基本情况统计报表制度(2016年),24ddd最新网站,InternallydisplacedpeoplewhofledRaqqacitystandneartentsinacampinAinIssa,northofRaqqa,SyriaonApril3,2017.[Photo/Agencies]ThePulitzerPrize,whichwasawardedthisMonday,recognizesjournalists'excellentworkinquestioningandinvestigation.ItputintosharpcontrastthelackofqualityreportingonSyriabytheUSmainstreamnewsoutlets.TheApril4chemicalweaponsattackinSyriawhichkilledcivilians,includingchildren,wasshocking.Theperpetrators,whoevertheywere,shouldbeidentifiedandpunished.Yetbeforeanyinvestigationcouldevenbecarriedout,theUSgovernmentdecidedunilaterallyitwastheSyriangovernmentarmythatlaunchedtheattack.USPresidentDonaldTrumporderedanairstrikeontheSyrianal-Shayratairforcebase.Besidesdestroyingmilitaryjets,theairdefensesystemandotherlogisticalfacilities,thebombingkilledandinjuredanumberofcivilians.Inthepastweek,theUSmainstreammediahasmostlyfocusedonTrump'sU-turninhisSyriapolicy,orwhetheritmeansanotherIraqtypeofwar.FewhaveaskedwhetheritwastheSyriangovernmentarmyortheoppositionarmythatusedthechemicalweaponsorwhethertheUSairstrikeviolatedinternationallaw.Itremindsmanyofthesituationin2003whenthenUSsecretaryofstateColinPowellwenttotheUnitedNationstomakeacaseforinvadingIraq.Theargumentwaslaterfoundtobebasedonfalseevidence.Althoughtheyweresharplycriticallater,theunquestioningUSnewsmediaatthattimehasbeenwidelyviewedasstrengtheningthecredibilityofPowell.AccordingtoaUniversityofMarylandstudy,57percentofUSmainstreammediaviewersatthetimebelievedIraqsupportedal-QaidaandwasdirectlyinvolvedintheSept11attacksontheUSin2001.And69percentbelievedthatSaddamHusseinwaspersonallyinvolvedinthe9/11attacks.Noneofthesewastrue.Thistime,USmainstreamnewsoutlets,exceptthepublicservicenetworkC-SPAN,didnotevencovertheheateddebateattheemergencymeetingonSyriaattheUNSecurityCouncilonApril7,wherediverseviewswerepresented.Forexample,BolivianambassadortotheUNSachaLlorenti,holdinganenlargedphotoofPowellinhis2003presentationattheUN,saidtheallegedweaponofmassdestructionwasneverfound.Sweden'sambassadortotheUNOlofSkoogclaimedtheUSmissilestrike"raisesquestionsofcompatibilitywithinternationallaw."Underinternationallaws,suchanairstrikeonacountrywouldrequirethemandateoftheUNSecurityCouncilunlesstheUSwasactinginself-defense.Itwasnotjustthemainstreammedia.OpinionleadersinmajorUSthinktanksdidnotquestionthestrikemucheither.ExceptforthelibertarianCatoInstitute,fewraisedanyquestionsaboutthelegalityoftheairstrike.OfthefiveBrookingsInstitutionscholarswhopostedtheircommentsontheinstitute'swebsiteaftertheUSattack,onlyone,ChuckCall,raisedtheissue,saying"theactreflectsadisregardformultilateralorganizationsandapproaches,anditsinternationallegalbasisremainsunclear".CharlieSavageofTheNewYorkTimeswasprobablyoneofthefewUSjournaliststodelveintothelegalityissue.HislengthyarticleonFridaycalledtheairstrikeintoquestionunderbothinternationalanddomesticlaws.Asnationsmaketheirstancesknown,oneobviousquestionthatshouldberaisedishowsomecountriescansupporttheUSairstrikeatthesametimetheyarepushingforaninternationalinvestigation.Ifyousupportthelaunchof59TomahawkmissilesasapunishmentfortheSyriangovernment,youmustbecertainwhowastheperpetrator.Butwhenyousupportaninvestigation,itmeansthatyouarenotabsolutelysurewhoactuallyusedthechemicalweapons.IhavenotheardsuchabasicquestionraisedbyUSmainstreammedia.TheauthorisdeputyeditorofChinaDailyUSA.chenweihua@chinadailyusa.com